Individual differences in working memory predict the efficacy of experimenter‐manipulated gestures in first‐grade children.
Saved in:
| Title: | Individual differences in working memory predict the efficacy of experimenter‐manipulated gestures in first‐grade children. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Congdon, Eliza L. (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Child Development. Sep2024, Vol. 95 Issue 5, p1494-1507. 14p. |
| Subjects: | Individual differences, Short-term memory in children, First grade (Education), Teaching methods, Gesture, Verbal memory, Learning ability |
| Abstract: | Why is instructional gesture ineffective in some contexts? And what is it about learners that predicts whether they will learn from gestures? This between‐subjects linear measurement training study compares gesture instruction to two controls—operant action and transient action—in a diverse sample of first‐grade students (N = 174, Mage = 7.01 years; Nfemale = 84; Nmale = 90, 10% Latinx‐identified; 70% White; 6% Black; 6% Asian; 18% multiple racial categories, Mincome = $59,750, SDincome ≈ $25,000; data collected 03/16–03/19). Results show that instructor‐manipulated gestures may be less effective than demonstrative actions in part because they are iterative and do not leave a lasting trace. Verbal working memory, but not spatial, positively predicted an ability to learn from gesture and transient action in children with the lowest context knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Child Development is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Why is instructional gesture ineffective in some contexts? And what is it about learners that predicts whether they will learn from gestures? This between‐subjects linear measurement training study compares gesture instruction to two controls—operant action and transient action—in a diverse sample of first‐grade students (N = 174, Mage = 7.01 years; Nfemale = 84; Nmale = 90, 10% Latinx‐identified; 70% White; 6% Black; 6% Asian; 18% multiple racial categories, Mincome = $59,750, SDincome ≈ $25,000; data collected 03/16–03/19). Results show that instructor‐manipulated gestures may be less effective than demonstrative actions in part because they are iterative and do not leave a lasting trace. Verbal working memory, but not spatial, positively predicted an ability to learn from gesture and transient action in children with the lowest context knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00093920 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/cdev.14083 |
