The token undermining effect: When and why adding a small reward to a dated outcome makes it less preferred.
Saved in:
| Title: | The token undermining effect: When and why adding a small reward to a dated outcome makes it less preferred. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Jiang, Cheng‐Ming, Chen, Li‐Na, Luo, Qian, Wang, Wen, Zhou, Jing, Ma, Jia‐Tao |
| Source: | British Journal of Psychology. May2025, Vol. 116 Issue 2, p386-408. 23p. |
| Subjects: | Consumer attitudes, Decision making, Marketing, Attention, Reward (Psychology), Motivation (Psychology), Customer satisfaction |
| Abstract: | The mere token strategy, which adds a small reward (token) to an option to increase attractiveness, is widely used in the consumer field. However, we conducted six studies that seek to confirm the 'token undermining effect', where adding a small token to a sooner and smaller reward (SS) paired with a later and larger reward (LL) decreases the preference for the SS. The results showed that the effect persists across various choice sets, participant populations, reward amounts, delays, outcome properties and regardless of whether the scenarios are incentivized. However, an important boundary condition was that the token must share the same nature as the original option. Furthermore, we used mouse cursor tracking methods to examine the underlying process of attention allocation and demonstrated that adding a small token to the SS leads individuals to allocate more attention to the magnitude dimension than to the delay dimension, ultimately decreasing their preference for the SS. Therefore, managers and policymakers should use the mere token strategy with caution as it could backfire. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of British Journal of Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 184403782 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The token undermining effect: When and why adding a small reward to a dated outcome makes it less preferred. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jiang%2C+Cheng‐Ming%22">Jiang, Cheng‐Ming</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Li‐Na%22">Chen, Li‐Na</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Luo%2C+Qian%22">Luo, Qian</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Wen%22">Wang, Wen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhou%2C+Jing%22">Zhou, Jing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ma%2C+Jia‐Tao%22">Ma, Jia‐Tao</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22British+Journal+of+Psychology%22">British Journal of Psychology</searchLink>. May2025, Vol. 116 Issue 2, p386-408. 23p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consumer+attitudes%22">Consumer attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Marketing%22">Marketing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attention%22">Attention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reward+%28Psychology%29%22">Reward (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation+%28Psychology%29%22">Motivation (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Customer+satisfaction%22">Customer satisfaction</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The mere token strategy, which adds a small reward (token) to an option to increase attractiveness, is widely used in the consumer field. However, we conducted six studies that seek to confirm the 'token undermining effect', where adding a small token to a sooner and smaller reward (SS) paired with a later and larger reward (LL) decreases the preference for the SS. The results showed that the effect persists across various choice sets, participant populations, reward amounts, delays, outcome properties and regardless of whether the scenarios are incentivized. However, an important boundary condition was that the token must share the same nature as the original option. Furthermore, we used mouse cursor tracking methods to examine the underlying process of attention allocation and demonstrated that adding a small token to the SS leads individuals to allocate more attention to the magnitude dimension than to the delay dimension, ultimately decreasing their preference for the SS. Therefore, managers and policymakers should use the mere token strategy with caution as it could backfire. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of British Journal of Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=184403782 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/bjop.12758 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 23 StartPage: 386 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Consumer attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision making Type: general – SubjectFull: Marketing Type: general – SubjectFull: Attention Type: general – SubjectFull: Reward (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Motivation (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Customer satisfaction Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The token undermining effect: When and why adding a small reward to a dated outcome makes it less preferred. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jiang, Cheng‐Ming – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chen, Li‐Na – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Luo, Qian – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Wen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zhou, Jing – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ma, Jia‐Tao IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00071269 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 116 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: British Journal of Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |