Socio‐ecological domains and adolescent mental health: An application of the dual‐factor model.
Saved in:
| Title: | Socio‐ecological domains and adolescent mental health: An application of the dual‐factor model. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Rose, Theda (AUTHOR), Lambert, Sharon (AUTHOR), Liu, Chang (AUTHOR), Raghunathan, Radhika S. (AUTHOR), Musci, Rashelle J. (AUTHOR), Sullivan, Alexandra D. W. (AUTHOR), Lyall, Kristen (AUTHOR), Elliott, Amy J. (AUTHOR), McEvoy, Cindy T. (AUTHOR), Frazier, Jean A. (AUTHOR), Shipp, Gayle M. (AUTHOR), Koinis‐Mitchell, Daphne (AUTHOR), Ganiban, Jody M. (AUTHOR), Smith, P. Brian (AUTHOR), Newby, L. Kristin (AUTHOR), Adair, Linda (AUTHOR), Jacobson, Lisa P. (AUTHOR), Catellier, Diane (AUTHOR), McGrath, Monica (AUTHOR), Douglas, Christian (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell). Jun2025, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p1-15. 15p. |
| Subjects: | Mental illness, Race, Pathological psychology, Well-being, Adolescent health |
| Abstract: | Comprehensive assessment of mental health includes wellbeing and psychopathology. Using the dual‐factor model of mental health, this study explored associations between socioecological domains and mental health profiles and subsequent moderations by sex, race and ethnicity, and age. Cross‐sectional data were from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohort (N = 2826). Adolescents were 11–17 years old (mean age 14.4 ± 2.1), 55.3% non‐Hispanic White, and 48% girls. Using latent profile analysis, four mental health groups were identified: positive mental health; parent‐endorsed symptoms, but content; vulnerable; and troubled. Latent regression analyses showed that, overall, better family, peer, and teacher‐school relationships were found in the positive mental health group compared with other groups. No significant moderations were observed. Implications for practice and policy are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Comprehensive assessment of mental health includes wellbeing and psychopathology. Using the dual‐factor model of mental health, this study explored associations between socioecological domains and mental health profiles and subsequent moderations by sex, race and ethnicity, and age. Cross‐sectional data were from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohort (N = 2826). Adolescents were 11–17 years old (mean age 14.4 ± 2.1), 55.3% non‐Hispanic White, and 48% girls. Using latent profile analysis, four mental health groups were identified: positive mental health; parent‐endorsed symptoms, but content; vulnerable; and troubled. Latent regression analyses showed that, overall, better family, peer, and teacher‐school relationships were found in the positive mental health group compared with other groups. No significant moderations were observed. Implications for practice and policy are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10508392 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jora.70029 |
