Beyond shelter: a scoping review of evidence on housing in resettlement countries and refugee mental health and wellbeing.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Beyond shelter: a scoping review of evidence on housing in resettlement countries and refugee mental health and wellbeing.
Authors: McShane, Sheenagh (AUTHOR), Block, Karen (AUTHOR), Baker, Emma (AUTHOR), Li, Yuxi (AUTHOR), Bentley, Rebecca (AUTHOR)
Source: Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology. Jul2025, Vol. 60 Issue 7, p1541-1562. 22p.
Subjects: Social determinants of health, High-income countries, Public health, Health of refugees, Refugee resettlement, Refugee children
Abstract: Purpose: The number of displaced people globally has rapidly increased in the past decade. Housing is an important social determinant of health and a key contributor to poor health outcomes in refugee and asylum seeker populations. It is important to examine evidence for how housing impacts the mental health of refugees and asylum seekers. This review seeks to analyse the research describing how housing conditions and policies are associated with refugee mental health and wellbeing in high-income resettlement countries (such as the United States, Canada, and Australia). Methods: A scoping review identified forty-four relevant studies. These studies examined various aspects of housing and/or accommodation and their association with mental health and wellbeing in resettled refugee populations. Results: We found evidence of a relationship between four domains of housing—policy, suitability, environment and time—and mental health. Furthermore, we found evidence that refugees settling in high income countries experienced significant housing issues. Overall, problems with housing quality, location, accessibility (i.e., the nature of systems that govern access to housing) and suitability were associated with poorer mental health outcomes. Conclusions: In high-income countries, the lack of choice and agency regarding housing contributed to poor mental health outcomes among refugees and asylum seekers. Policies and practices should prioritise the quality, suitability, and accessibility of refugee housing, look at ways to increase choice and agency in resettlement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Purpose: The number of displaced people globally has rapidly increased in the past decade. Housing is an important social determinant of health and a key contributor to poor health outcomes in refugee and asylum seeker populations. It is important to examine evidence for how housing impacts the mental health of refugees and asylum seekers. This review seeks to analyse the research describing how housing conditions and policies are associated with refugee mental health and wellbeing in high-income resettlement countries (such as the United States, Canada, and Australia). Methods: A scoping review identified forty-four relevant studies. These studies examined various aspects of housing and/or accommodation and their association with mental health and wellbeing in resettled refugee populations. Results: We found evidence of a relationship between four domains of housing—policy, suitability, environment and time—and mental health. Furthermore, we found evidence that refugees settling in high income countries experienced significant housing issues. Overall, problems with housing quality, location, accessibility (i.e., the nature of systems that govern access to housing) and suitability were associated with poorer mental health outcomes. Conclusions: In high-income countries, the lack of choice and agency regarding housing contributed to poor mental health outcomes among refugees and asylum seekers. Policies and practices should prioritise the quality, suitability, and accessibility of refugee housing, look at ways to increase choice and agency in resettlement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09337954
DOI:10.1007/s00127-025-02851-1