Predicting response to non-invasive brain stimulation in post-stroke upper extremity motor impairment: the importance of neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers.
Saved in:
| Title: | Predicting response to non-invasive brain stimulation in post-stroke upper extremity motor impairment: the importance of neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Barreto, Gabriel (AUTHOR), Fonseca, André (AUTHOR), Albuquerque, Rhayssa (AUTHOR), Santos, Camilla (AUTHOR), Brito, Rodrigo (AUTHOR), Piscitelli, Daniele (AUTHOR), de Araújo, Maria das Graças Rodrigues (AUTHOR), Monte-Silva, Katia (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Neurological Sciences. Aug2025, Vol. 46 Issue 8, p3747-3755. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Transcranial direct current stimulation, Machine learning, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Brain stimulation, Medical sciences |
| Abstract: | Background: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a promising approach to enhance upper extremity motor impairment (UEMI) recovery in post-stroke individuals. However, variability in treatment response poses a significant challenge. Identifying neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers that predict NIBS response could improve personalization and treatment efficacy. Objectives: This study aims to determine the predictive relevance of neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers for responses to NIBS in post-stroke UEMI using a machine learning model. Methods: This secondary analysis involved 63 post-stroke individuals with UEMI (age 56.9 ± 11.1 years). A support vector machine model was used to assess the importance of two neurophysiological biomarkers—brain activity in the lesioned hemisphere quantified using quantitative electroencephalography (power ratio index, PRI) and corticospinal tract (CST) integrity assessed via transcranial magnetic stimulation—and one clinical biomarker—the level of UEMI assessed with Fugl-Meyer upper extremity (FMA-UE)—in predicting responders (ΔFMA-UE ≥ 5 points) and those with excellent response (ΔFMA-UE ≥ 10 points) to NIBS based on the change of FMA-UE before and after treatment. Results: Of the 63 participants, 42 (65%) were classified as responders, and 14 (22%) demonstrated excellent responses. Predictive importance for responders was 0.78 for PRI-LH, 0.21 for UEMI level, and 0.01 for CST integrity. For predicting excellent responses, PRI-LH had an importance of 0.39, UEMI level 0.37, and CST integrity 0.24. Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of electrical brain activity in the LH and UEMI level in predicting NIBS responders and excellent responses, with CST integrity being particularly valuable for excellent outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Neurological Sciences is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Background: Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a promising approach to enhance upper extremity motor impairment (UEMI) recovery in post-stroke individuals. However, variability in treatment response poses a significant challenge. Identifying neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers that predict NIBS response could improve personalization and treatment efficacy. Objectives: This study aims to determine the predictive relevance of neurophysiological and clinical biomarkers for responses to NIBS in post-stroke UEMI using a machine learning model. Methods: This secondary analysis involved 63 post-stroke individuals with UEMI (age 56.9 ± 11.1 years). A support vector machine model was used to assess the importance of two neurophysiological biomarkers—brain activity in the lesioned hemisphere quantified using quantitative electroencephalography (power ratio index, PRI) and corticospinal tract (CST) integrity assessed via transcranial magnetic stimulation—and one clinical biomarker—the level of UEMI assessed with Fugl-Meyer upper extremity (FMA-UE)—in predicting responders (ΔFMA-UE ≥ 5 points) and those with excellent response (ΔFMA-UE ≥ 10 points) to NIBS based on the change of FMA-UE before and after treatment. Results: Of the 63 participants, 42 (65%) were classified as responders, and 14 (22%) demonstrated excellent responses. Predictive importance for responders was 0.78 for PRI-LH, 0.21 for UEMI level, and 0.01 for CST integrity. For predicting excellent responses, PRI-LH had an importance of 0.39, UEMI level 0.37, and CST integrity 0.24. Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of electrical brain activity in the LH and UEMI level in predicting NIBS responders and excellent responses, with CST integrity being particularly valuable for excellent outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15901874 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10072-025-08156-0 |
