Detection of noncredible cognitive performance with Wechsler Memory Scale-IV measures in mild traumatic brain injury litigants.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Detection of noncredible cognitive performance with Wechsler Memory Scale-IV measures in mild traumatic brain injury litigants.
Authors: Henry, George K. (AUTHOR)
Source: Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. Sep/Oct2025, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p1454-1461. 8p.
Subjects: Recognition (Psychology), Brain injuries, Cognitive ability, Test validity, Dependent variables
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the operating characteristics of selective measures on the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV (WMS-IV) to predict noncredible neurocognitive dysfunction in a sample of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) litigants. Method: Participants included 110 adults who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological examination. Criterion groups were formed based upon their performance on stand-alone measures of cognitive performance validity testing (PVT). Results: Participants failing two stand-alone PVTs exhibited significantly lower scores across all WMS-IV dependent variables of interest compared to participants who passed both PVTs. Participants who failed one PVT were excluded. Bivariate logistic regression revealed that all six dependent variables were significant predictors of PVT status. The best prediction model consisted of three WMS-IV variables including Logical Memory Delayed Recall (LM2), Logical Memory Recognition (LMR), and Visual Reproduction Recognition (VRR). This model demonstrated an accuracy of 90.2%, 0.89 sensitivity, 0.92 specificity, and a Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) of 0.957. Conclusion: The current empirically-derived cutscores and logit equation for the WMS-IV may be an additional consideration in analyzing database validity and noncredible performance in mTBI personal injury litigants ages 18–69. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Applied Neuropsychology: Adult is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the operating characteristics of selective measures on the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV (WMS-IV) to predict noncredible neurocognitive dysfunction in a sample of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) litigants. Method: Participants included 110 adults who underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological examination. Criterion groups were formed based upon their performance on stand-alone measures of cognitive performance validity testing (PVT). Results: Participants failing two stand-alone PVTs exhibited significantly lower scores across all WMS-IV dependent variables of interest compared to participants who passed both PVTs. Participants who failed one PVT were excluded. Bivariate logistic regression revealed that all six dependent variables were significant predictors of PVT status. The best prediction model consisted of three WMS-IV variables including Logical Memory Delayed Recall (LM2), Logical Memory Recognition (LMR), and Visual Reproduction Recognition (VRR). This model demonstrated an accuracy of 90.2%, 0.89 sensitivity, 0.92 specificity, and a Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) of 0.957. Conclusion: The current empirically-derived cutscores and logit equation for the WMS-IV may be an additional consideration in analyzing database validity and noncredible performance in mTBI personal injury litigants ages 18–69. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:23279095
DOI:10.1080/23279095.2023.2287139