Correction: Correction to: Scheffels JF, Eling P, Hildebrandt H. Is recalibration more important than realignment in prism adaptation training for visuospatial neglect? A randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2024 Feb 12:1-22. doi:10.1080/09602011.2024.2314877. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38346126
Saved in:
| Title: | Correction: Correction to: Scheffels JF, Eling P, Hildebrandt H. Is recalibration more important than realignment in prism adaptation training for visuospatial neglect? A randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2024 Feb 12:1-22. doi:10.1080/09602011.2024.2314877. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38346126 |
|---|---|
| Source: | Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Sep2025, Vol. 35 Issue 8, p1527-1530. 4p. |
| Subjects: | Effect sizes (Statistics), Nonparametric statistics, Statistical hypothesis testing, Statistics, Randomized controlled trials, Unilateral neglect, Mathematical statistics |
| Abstract: | The article focuses on the necessary corrections to statistical analyses in a study examining the effects of various protocols on visuospatial attention in patients with neglect. The authors identified errors in the reported p-values and effect size interpretations, specifically regarding the PROTOCOL x POSITION interaction and the thresholds for partial eta squared values. They conducted alternative non-parametric analyses, revealing that the PAT2 protocol significantly differed from the PRE condition but not from other protocols, leading to a revised interpretation of the findings. The authors emphasize the need for caution in claiming the efficacy of the PAT protocols and suggest further research with larger sample sizes to validate their results. [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The article focuses on the necessary corrections to statistical analyses in a study examining the effects of various protocols on visuospatial attention in patients with neglect. The authors identified errors in the reported p-values and effect size interpretations, specifically regarding the PROTOCOL x POSITION interaction and the thresholds for partial eta squared values. They conducted alternative non-parametric analyses, revealing that the PAT2 protocol significantly differed from the PRE condition but not from other protocols, leading to a revised interpretation of the findings. The authors emphasize the need for caution in claiming the efficacy of the PAT protocols and suggest further research with larger sample sizes to validate their results. [Extracted from the article] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 09602011 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09602011.2025.2497183 |
