The Community College Transfer and Articulation Network.
Saved in:
| Title: | The Community College Transfer and Articulation Network. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | González Canché, Manuel S. (AUTHOR), Zhang, Chelsea (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Higher Education. 2025, Vol. 96 Issue 6, p1114-1156. 43p. |
| Subjects: | Community colleges, Transfer of students, Partnerships in education, Coalitions, Education policy, Bachelor's degree, Educational outcomes, Institutional cooperation |
| Abstract: | Over the past three decades, while most community college students aspired to a four-year degree, only about 30% successfully transferred. Despite thousands of transfer agreements, understanding which institutions, programs, disciplines, and states engage in these partnerships remains limited. Analyzing 16,452 active agreements among community colleges and four-year institutions within and out-of-state, our findings indicate that community colleges and public four-year institutions are pivotal in forming in-state transfer agreements, while out-of-state agreements are driven by private four-year colleges. In-state agreements often focus on key disciplines like business, management, and education, while out-of-state partnerships are more diverse, reflecting varied regional priorities. Though Pennsylvania, New York, Virginia, and Kentucky are the most active states in these partnerships, we observed significant spatial dependence, with neighboring states showing similar participation rates. Surprisingly, we found that statewide transfer policies decreased partnership formation. Institutional proximity and state education levels influence agreements formation, while net migration negatively impacts it. We emphasize that a better understanding of the structure of these agreements is necessary for establishing new or fostering effective partnerships that improve students' chances of a four-year degree attainment. Our takeaways/recommendations may help policymakers enhance or establish these bilateral agreements. Replication code and data are available here . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Higher Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Over the past three decades, while most community college students aspired to a four-year degree, only about 30% successfully transferred. Despite thousands of transfer agreements, understanding which institutions, programs, disciplines, and states engage in these partnerships remains limited. Analyzing 16,452 active agreements among community colleges and four-year institutions within and out-of-state, our findings indicate that community colleges and public four-year institutions are pivotal in forming in-state transfer agreements, while out-of-state agreements are driven by private four-year colleges. In-state agreements often focus on key disciplines like business, management, and education, while out-of-state partnerships are more diverse, reflecting varied regional priorities. Though Pennsylvania, New York, Virginia, and Kentucky are the most active states in these partnerships, we observed significant spatial dependence, with neighboring states showing similar participation rates. Surprisingly, we found that statewide transfer policies decreased partnership formation. Institutional proximity and state education levels influence agreements formation, while net migration negatively impacts it. We emphasize that a better understanding of the structure of these agreements is necessary for establishing new or fostering effective partnerships that improve students' chances of a four-year degree attainment. Our takeaways/recommendations may help policymakers enhance or establish these bilateral agreements. Replication code and data are available here . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00221546 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/00221546.2025.2468130 |
