Interphase cell morphology defines the mode, symmetry, and outcome of mitosis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Interphase cell morphology defines the mode, symmetry, and outcome of mitosis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Lovegrove, Holly E., Hulmes, Georgia E., Ghadaouia, Sabrina, Revell, Christopher, Giralt-Pujol, Marta, Alhashem, Zain, Pena, Andreia, Nogare, Damian D., Appleton, Ellen, Costa, Guilherme, Mort, Richard L., Ballestrem, Christoph, Jones, Gareth W., Manning, Cerys S., Chitnis, Ajay B., Franco, Claudio A., Linker, Claudia, Bentley, Katie, Herbert, Shane P. |
| Source: | Science. 5/1/2025, Vol. 388 Issue 6746, p1-14. 14p. |
| Subjects: | Cell morphology, Morphogenesis, Logperch, Cell division, Mitosis |
| Abstract: | During tissue formation, dynamic cell shape changes drive morphogenesis while asymmetric divisions create cellular diversity. We found that the shifts in cell morphology that shape tissues could concomitantly act as conserved instructive cues that trigger asymmetric division and direct core identity decisions underpinning tissue building. We performed single-cell morphometric analyses of endothelial and other mesenchymal-like cells. Distinct morphological changes switched cells to an "isomorphic" mode of division, which preserved pre-mitotic morphology throughout mitosis. In isomorphic divisions, interphase morphology appeared to provide a geometric code defining mitotic symmetry, fate determinant partitioning, and daughter state. Rab4-positive endosomes recognized this code, allowing them to respond to pre-mitotic morphology and segregate determinants accordingly. Thus, morphogenetic shape change sculpts tissue form while also generating cellular heterogeneity, thereby driving tissue assembly. Editor's summary: As tissues assemble, the dynamic shape changes that define their form occur coincident with the asymmetric cell divisions that generate cellular diversity. Lovegrove et al. used morphometric analyses of tissue formation in multiple contexts, including zebrafish, human, and mouse blood vessel and neural crest development, finding that these morphogenetic events are fundamentally co-dependent. Distinct shifts in shape-switched cells to a so-called "isomorphic" mode of division, which preserves premitotic shape and the unequal distribution of identity determinants throughout division. This switch, which avoids the usual cell rounding associated with division, breaks symmetry and creates daughter cells that adopt disparate identities. Thus, shape change sculpts tissue architecture and tunes the mode, symmetry, and outcome of cell division to direct identity decisions driving tissue building. —Stella M. Hurtley INTRODUCTION: Tissue formation requires the concerted coordination of diverse cellular processes. For example, the major shifts in cell shape that define tissue architecture frequently occur concomitant with the asymmetric cell divisions that generate tissue heterogeneity. Tight spatiotemporal coupling of distinct morphogenetic events is thus critical to achieving robust tissue assembly. RATIONALE: In addition to sculpting tissue form, cell shape remodeling also plays a fundamental role in the control of cell division. Upon mitotic entry, metazoan cells typically adopt a spherical shape following global reorganization of the interphase cytoskeleton. This mitotic rounding both promotes high-fidelity segregation of genetic material and generation of equally sized daughters that symmetrically partition most nongenetic cellular components. Thus, modulation of mitotic rounding would represent an elegant means to switch cells from a symmetric to asymmetric division outcome. However, whether cells have the capacity to tune the extent of their mitotic rounding and how this would influence mitotic symmetry and/or daughter identity remains unclear. Moreover, whether prior shifts in interphase cell morphology have any impact on the extent of mitotic shape remodeling or symmetry of division remains unexplored. We hypothesized that, if shifts in interphase cell morphology can indeed affect mitotic shape remodeling, this could explain the close coupling of morphogenetic shape change with the switches in the symmetry of division observed during tissue building. RESULTS: To investigate the codependence of interphase and mitotic cell shape dynamics, we exploited single-cell morphometric analyses of tissue formation in multiple contexts, including blood vessel and neural crest development. These analyses revealed that stereotyped shifts in pre-mitotic cell morphology act as conserved instructive cues that tune the mode, symmetry, and outcome of mitosis. We identified that distinct shifts in mesenchymal-like cell morphology switch cells to an "isomorphic" mode of division, which uncharacteristically evades mitotic rounding and preserves pre-mitotic cell morphology throughout division. Using a combination of micropatterning tools and in vivo live imaging, we revealed that preservation of asymmetries in interphase cell morphology during division also resulted in the maintenance of asymmetric distributions of key signaling factors. Specifically, we found that during isomorphic divisions, Rab4-positive recycling endosomes and their fate-determinant cargo were asymmetrically inherited, thereby generating daughters of differing identities. CONCLUSION: These observations uncovered dynamic modulation of the extent of mitotic rounding as a previously unknown trigger for asymmetric cell division. In contrast to the current view, this data suggests that mitotic cell rounding is far from a universal feature of mesenchymal-like cell division and is often elegantly tuned by pre-mitotic cell morphology. Moreover, we identified that cells exploit this phenomenon to functionally couple shifts in interphase shape to the induction of distinct daughter cell identities and behaviours, thereby directing tissue assembly. Thus, morphogenetic cell shape change not only sculpts tissue form but concomitantly generates the cellular diversity underpinning tissue building. Considering that most mesenchymal-like cells exhibit equivalent shape dynamics during tissue remodeling, including metastatic cancer cells, instructive cues encoded in interphase morphology are likely an underappreciated and conserved modulator of mitotic symmetry and cell state heterogeneity in diverse tissue contexts. Shifts in interphase cell morphology tune the mode and symmetry of mitosis.: Elongation of cells as they migrate in vivo, or upon micropatterning in vitro, switches cells to a newly defined isomorphic mode of division. In isomorphic divisions, cells uncharacteristically retain pre-mitotic asymmetries in morphology and fate determinant positioning throughout mitosis. Consequently, isomorphic division fundamentally couples interphase shape change to induction of symmetric cell divisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Science is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | During tissue formation, dynamic cell shape changes drive morphogenesis while asymmetric divisions create cellular diversity. We found that the shifts in cell morphology that shape tissues could concomitantly act as conserved instructive cues that trigger asymmetric division and direct core identity decisions underpinning tissue building. We performed single-cell morphometric analyses of endothelial and other mesenchymal-like cells. Distinct morphological changes switched cells to an "isomorphic" mode of division, which preserved pre-mitotic morphology throughout mitosis. In isomorphic divisions, interphase morphology appeared to provide a geometric code defining mitotic symmetry, fate determinant partitioning, and daughter state. Rab4-positive endosomes recognized this code, allowing them to respond to pre-mitotic morphology and segregate determinants accordingly. Thus, morphogenetic shape change sculpts tissue form while also generating cellular heterogeneity, thereby driving tissue assembly. Editor's summary: As tissues assemble, the dynamic shape changes that define their form occur coincident with the asymmetric cell divisions that generate cellular diversity. Lovegrove et al. used morphometric analyses of tissue formation in multiple contexts, including zebrafish, human, and mouse blood vessel and neural crest development, finding that these morphogenetic events are fundamentally co-dependent. Distinct shifts in shape-switched cells to a so-called "isomorphic" mode of division, which preserves premitotic shape and the unequal distribution of identity determinants throughout division. This switch, which avoids the usual cell rounding associated with division, breaks symmetry and creates daughter cells that adopt disparate identities. Thus, shape change sculpts tissue architecture and tunes the mode, symmetry, and outcome of cell division to direct identity decisions driving tissue building. —Stella M. Hurtley INTRODUCTION: Tissue formation requires the concerted coordination of diverse cellular processes. For example, the major shifts in cell shape that define tissue architecture frequently occur concomitant with the asymmetric cell divisions that generate tissue heterogeneity. Tight spatiotemporal coupling of distinct morphogenetic events is thus critical to achieving robust tissue assembly. RATIONALE: In addition to sculpting tissue form, cell shape remodeling also plays a fundamental role in the control of cell division. Upon mitotic entry, metazoan cells typically adopt a spherical shape following global reorganization of the interphase cytoskeleton. This mitotic rounding both promotes high-fidelity segregation of genetic material and generation of equally sized daughters that symmetrically partition most nongenetic cellular components. Thus, modulation of mitotic rounding would represent an elegant means to switch cells from a symmetric to asymmetric division outcome. However, whether cells have the capacity to tune the extent of their mitotic rounding and how this would influence mitotic symmetry and/or daughter identity remains unclear. Moreover, whether prior shifts in interphase cell morphology have any impact on the extent of mitotic shape remodeling or symmetry of division remains unexplored. We hypothesized that, if shifts in interphase cell morphology can indeed affect mitotic shape remodeling, this could explain the close coupling of morphogenetic shape change with the switches in the symmetry of division observed during tissue building. RESULTS: To investigate the codependence of interphase and mitotic cell shape dynamics, we exploited single-cell morphometric analyses of tissue formation in multiple contexts, including blood vessel and neural crest development. These analyses revealed that stereotyped shifts in pre-mitotic cell morphology act as conserved instructive cues that tune the mode, symmetry, and outcome of mitosis. We identified that distinct shifts in mesenchymal-like cell morphology switch cells to an "isomorphic" mode of division, which uncharacteristically evades mitotic rounding and preserves pre-mitotic cell morphology throughout division. Using a combination of micropatterning tools and in vivo live imaging, we revealed that preservation of asymmetries in interphase cell morphology during division also resulted in the maintenance of asymmetric distributions of key signaling factors. Specifically, we found that during isomorphic divisions, Rab4-positive recycling endosomes and their fate-determinant cargo were asymmetrically inherited, thereby generating daughters of differing identities. CONCLUSION: These observations uncovered dynamic modulation of the extent of mitotic rounding as a previously unknown trigger for asymmetric cell division. In contrast to the current view, this data suggests that mitotic cell rounding is far from a universal feature of mesenchymal-like cell division and is often elegantly tuned by pre-mitotic cell morphology. Moreover, we identified that cells exploit this phenomenon to functionally couple shifts in interphase shape to the induction of distinct daughter cell identities and behaviours, thereby directing tissue assembly. Thus, morphogenetic cell shape change not only sculpts tissue form but concomitantly generates the cellular diversity underpinning tissue building. Considering that most mesenchymal-like cells exhibit equivalent shape dynamics during tissue remodeling, including metastatic cancer cells, instructive cues encoded in interphase morphology are likely an underappreciated and conserved modulator of mitotic symmetry and cell state heterogeneity in diverse tissue contexts. Shifts in interphase cell morphology tune the mode and symmetry of mitosis.: Elongation of cells as they migrate in vivo, or upon micropatterning in vitro, switches cells to a newly defined isomorphic mode of division. In isomorphic divisions, cells uncharacteristically retain pre-mitotic asymmetries in morphology and fate determinant positioning throughout mitosis. Consequently, isomorphic division fundamentally couples interphase shape change to induction of symmetric cell divisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00368075 |
| DOI: | 10.1126/science.adu9628 |
