Circadian dynamics of explicit memory performance in youth: exploring chronotype and synchrony effects.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Circadian dynamics of explicit memory performance in youth: exploring chronotype and synchrony effects.
Authors: Bettencourt, Catarina (AUTHOR), Pires, Luís (AUTHOR), Vilar, Manuela (AUTHOR), Almeida, Filipa (AUTHOR), Samarra, Sara (AUTHOR), Duarte, Raquel (AUTHOR), Allen Gomes, Ana (AUTHOR), Leitão, José (AUTHOR)
Source: Memory. Sep2025, Vol. 33 Issue 8, p896-908. 13p.
Subjects: Chronotype, Cronbach's alpha, Questionnaires, Two-way analysis of variance, Statistical sampling, Blind experiment, Memory in adolescence, Descriptive statistics, Randomized controlled trials, Circadian rhythms, Neuropsychological tests, Cognition in adolescence, Visual perception, Space perception, Data analysis software
Abstract: Cognitive performance oscillates throughout the day depending on an individual's chronotype, with synchrony effects being reported in memory performance. To examine these effects in an ecologically-valid setting, 74 children (M = 8.39years, SD =.54; 34 morning-types, 40 evening-types) and 79 adolescents (M = 13.05years, SD =.39; 41 morning-types, 38 evening-types) were selected based on chronotype. Participants underwent neuropsychological assessments in school on the first or last hour of the school day, with testing times randomised. About half of each chronotype-group was assessed in the morning and the other half in the afternoon. The protocol included measures of explicit memory, namely verbal episodic memory, visuospatial working memory, and semantic memory. Synchrony effects were found in episodic verbal memory for morning-type adolescents and visuospatial working memory for evening-types of both age groups. Main effects of chronotype were found only for episodic verbal memory, with contrasting patterns: morning-type children outperformed evening-type children, whereas for adolescents the effect of chronotype favoured evening-types and was modulated by the synchrony effect. No interaction or main effects of chronotype and time-of-day were found for semantic memory. Our findings suggest developmental specificities in how circadian preferences impact memory and underscore the potential benefits of aligning schedules with individual chronobiological profiles to optimise learning outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Memory is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Cognitive performance oscillates throughout the day depending on an individual's chronotype, with synchrony effects being reported in memory performance. To examine these effects in an ecologically-valid setting, 74 children (M = 8.39years, SD =.54; 34 morning-types, 40 evening-types) and 79 adolescents (M = 13.05years, SD =.39; 41 morning-types, 38 evening-types) were selected based on chronotype. Participants underwent neuropsychological assessments in school on the first or last hour of the school day, with testing times randomised. About half of each chronotype-group was assessed in the morning and the other half in the afternoon. The protocol included measures of explicit memory, namely verbal episodic memory, visuospatial working memory, and semantic memory. Synchrony effects were found in episodic verbal memory for morning-type adolescents and visuospatial working memory for evening-types of both age groups. Main effects of chronotype were found only for episodic verbal memory, with contrasting patterns: morning-type children outperformed evening-type children, whereas for adolescents the effect of chronotype favoured evening-types and was modulated by the synchrony effect. No interaction or main effects of chronotype and time-of-day were found for semantic memory. Our findings suggest developmental specificities in how circadian preferences impact memory and underscore the potential benefits of aligning schedules with individual chronobiological profiles to optimise learning outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09658211
DOI:10.1080/09658211.2025.2536688