Psychological counselling for students in higher education: a systematic review of its effectiveness on mental health and academic functioning.
Saved in:
| Title: | Psychological counselling for students in higher education: a systematic review of its effectiveness on mental health and academic functioning. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Pizzo, Rosa (AUTHOR), Esposito, Giovanna (AUTHOR), Passeggia, Raffaella (AUTHOR), Freda, Maria Francesca (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Counselling Psychology Quarterly. Dec2025, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p1082-1102. 21p. |
| Subjects: | Anxiety treatment, Competency assessment (Law), Anxiety prevention, Prevention of mental depression, Satisfaction, Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, Questionnaires, Medical care, Psychological well-being, Internet, Mental health counseling, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Telepsychology, Academic achievement, Psychology of college students, Online information services, Mental depression, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems |
| Abstract: | Psychological distress is increasingly prevalent among university student populations and demands for university counselling services have increased over the last decade. The current systematic review was aimed at summarizing the available evidence on the effectiveness of psychological counselling for students in higher education. A systematic search was undertaken in PsycInfo, PubMed and Scopus, resulting in 42 studies identified as eligible. The results provide evidence of the utility of psychological counselling for university students, identifying benefits in terms of global functioning and some symptoms, particularly with reference to depression and anxiety. Importantly, results showed that students who experienced a greater change in psychological functioning over the course of counselling reported greater improvements in academic performance. Improvements in GPAs and academic distress, but not in retention, were also found at post-intervention. Online counselling also proved to be effective, while the data remained inconclusive on whether attending more sessions may lead to more improvement. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally moderate. Finally, research recommendations were discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Counselling Psychology Quarterly is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Psychological distress is increasingly prevalent among university student populations and demands for university counselling services have increased over the last decade. The current systematic review was aimed at summarizing the available evidence on the effectiveness of psychological counselling for students in higher education. A systematic search was undertaken in PsycInfo, PubMed and Scopus, resulting in 42 studies identified as eligible. The results provide evidence of the utility of psychological counselling for university students, identifying benefits in terms of global functioning and some symptoms, particularly with reference to depression and anxiety. Importantly, results showed that students who experienced a greater change in psychological functioning over the course of counselling reported greater improvements in academic performance. Improvements in GPAs and academic distress, but not in retention, were also found at post-intervention. Online counselling also proved to be effective, while the data remained inconclusive on whether attending more sessions may lead to more improvement. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally moderate. Finally, research recommendations were discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 09515070 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09515070.2024.2434533 |
