The dual impact of meritocracy and denial of gender discrimination in political candidacy.
Saved in:
| Title: | The dual impact of meritocracy and denial of gender discrimination in political candidacy. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kim, Hanna (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Political Psychology. Dec2025, Vol. 46 Issue 6, p1618-1637. 20p. |
| Subjects: | Meritocracy, Women's empowerment, Glass ceiling (Employment discrimination), Women politicians, Sex discrimination, Cultural values, Political candidates, Sexism |
| Abstract: | Despite progress in gender equality, women remain underrepresented in politics, with a prevailing belief that barriers to gender discrimination have been virtually eliminated. This study examines why some women deny the existence of a glass ceiling despite facing gender discrimination, proposing that meritocracy ideology plays a role. Analyzing data from the World Values Survey, the study revealed that while meritocracy reduces prejudice about men's suitability for leadership, it is also linked to denying gender discrimination in political opportunities. This dual influence varies by national context: the negative link between meritocracy and explicit sexism is stronger in countries with lower women's empowerment, while the denial of gender discrimination in political representation is more pronounced in countries with higher women's empowerment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Political Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: pbh DbLabel: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection An: 189766411 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The dual impact of meritocracy and denial of gender discrimination in political candidacy. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kim%2C+Hanna%22">Kim, Hanna</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Political+Psychology%22">Political Psychology</searchLink>. Dec2025, Vol. 46 Issue 6, p1618-1637. 20p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meritocracy%22">Meritocracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Women's+empowerment%22">Women's empowerment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Glass+ceiling+%28Employment+discrimination%29%22">Glass ceiling (Employment discrimination)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Women+politicians%22">Women politicians</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+discrimination%22">Sex discrimination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cultural+values%22">Cultural values</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Political+candidates%22">Political candidates</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sexism%22">Sexism</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Despite progress in gender equality, women remain underrepresented in politics, with a prevailing belief that barriers to gender discrimination have been virtually eliminated. This study examines why some women deny the existence of a glass ceiling despite facing gender discrimination, proposing that meritocracy ideology plays a role. Analyzing data from the World Values Survey, the study revealed that while meritocracy reduces prejudice about men's suitability for leadership, it is also linked to denying gender discrimination in political opportunities. This dual influence varies by national context: the negative link between meritocracy and explicit sexism is stronger in countries with lower women's empowerment, while the denial of gender discrimination in political representation is more pronounced in countries with higher women's empowerment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Political Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=pbh&AN=189766411 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/pops.70002 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 StartPage: 1618 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Meritocracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Women's empowerment Type: general – SubjectFull: Glass ceiling (Employment discrimination) Type: general – SubjectFull: Women politicians Type: general – SubjectFull: Sex discrimination Type: general – SubjectFull: Cultural values Type: general – SubjectFull: Political candidates Type: general – SubjectFull: Sexism Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The dual impact of meritocracy and denial of gender discrimination in political candidacy. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kim, Hanna IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0162895X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 46 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Political Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |