Implementing Good Psychiatric Management in mental health services.
Saved in:
| Title: | Implementing Good Psychiatric Management in mental health services. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Javaid, Sikva (AUTHOR), Quan, Sonja (AUTHOR), Ng, Lillian (AUTHOR), Ramalho, Rodrigo (AUTHOR), Choi-Kain, Lois (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Australasian Psychiatry. Feb2026, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p73-78. 6p. |
| Subjects: | Borderline personality disorder, Mental health services, Leadership, Evidence-based psychiatry, Self-efficacy, Attitude (Psychology), Evidence-based medicine, Cross-functional teams |
| Abstract: | Objective: Good Psychiatric Management (GPM) is a structured, evidence-based approach for treating borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this study, we aimed to explore the experiences of using GPM within a multidisciplinary mental health team and to identify factors that promote or impede its implementation and practice. Methods: The study design was informed by interpretive description methodology. Semi-structured, in-person interviews were conducted with staff based at an assertive community outreach service (ACOS) trained in GPM. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded by reflexive thematic analysis. Results: From eleven participants of social work, community support work, nursing, psychology, occupational therapy and managerial backgrounds, we identified three main themes: (1) GPM as complementary to practitioners' values, (2) GPM as empowerment to deliver treatment confidently and consistently and (3) leadership as instrumental for the implementation of a new model. Conclusions: Implementing GPM as a shared model of care has value for health professionals by improving confidence and skills in working with people with BPD and increasing team cohesion. Effective leadership facilitates the introduction of an empirically supported evidence-based model of care, even when there are system constraints. Further research is needed to evaluate the use of GPM in general healthcare settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Australasian Psychiatry is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: Good Psychiatric Management (GPM) is a structured, evidence-based approach for treating borderline personality disorder (BPD). In this study, we aimed to explore the experiences of using GPM within a multidisciplinary mental health team and to identify factors that promote or impede its implementation and practice. Methods: The study design was informed by interpretive description methodology. Semi-structured, in-person interviews were conducted with staff based at an assertive community outreach service (ACOS) trained in GPM. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and coded by reflexive thematic analysis. Results: From eleven participants of social work, community support work, nursing, psychology, occupational therapy and managerial backgrounds, we identified three main themes: (1) GPM as complementary to practitioners' values, (2) GPM as empowerment to deliver treatment confidently and consistently and (3) leadership as instrumental for the implementation of a new model. Conclusions: Implementing GPM as a shared model of care has value for health professionals by improving confidence and skills in working with people with BPD and increasing team cohesion. Effective leadership facilitates the introduction of an empirically supported evidence-based model of care, even when there are system constraints. Further research is needed to evaluate the use of GPM in general healthcare settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10398562 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/10398562251378259 |
