View in EDS

Has mental health changed in children and adolescents registered with a dedicated support service responding to the Manchester Arena attack: 3-year follow-up.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Has mental health changed in children and adolescents registered with a dedicated support service responding to the Manchester Arena attack: 3-year follow-up.
Authors: Hussey, Louise (AUTHOR), Gittins, Matthew (AUTHOR), Hedges, Anna (AUTHOR), Dobbie, Scott (AUTHOR), Barrett, Alan (AUTHOR), French, Paul (AUTHOR), Chitsabesan, Prathiba (AUTHOR)
Source: British Journal of Psychiatry. Mar2026, Vol. 228 Issue 3, p244-251. 8p.
Subjects: Manchester Arena Bombing, Manchester, England, 2017, Child mental health services, Adolescent health, Separation anxiety, Psychological stress, Emotional trauma, Depression in adolescence, Psychological resilience
Abstract: Background: The Resilience Hub was established to coordinate mental health and psychosocial support for anyone affected by the 2017 Manchester Arena terrorist attack. Aims: To use the Hub's mental health screening data to examine the variation in symptoms reported by children and young persons (CYP) and their parent/guardian and explore any association with time delay in post-event registration or parental distress. Method: CYP engaging with Hub services were separated into eight 'admission' groups depending on when they registered post-incident. CYP were screened for trauma, depression, and generalised and separation anxiety. Parents/guardians also completed screening measures for their own and their child's anxiety. Baseline and follow-up scores were compared between admission groups. Parental and CYP assessments of the CYP's anxiety score was compared with the measure of parental distress. Results: Almost half of CYP registered in the first 3 months of service launch, with numbers of new registrations falling during each subsequent screening cycle. Generally, there was an increase in baseline screening scores as Hub registration time increased. The Children's Impact of Event scale score decreased by 0.11 (95% CI: −0.17, −0.05) per month, but the score for depression increased by 0.06 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.10). Longitudinal patterns in anxiety and separation were difficult to discern. Screening scores of CYP registering later reduced at a faster rate than those of the first registrants. Higher levels of parental mental distress were correlated with increased anxiety scores assigned to the CYP in relation to the anxiety score reported by the CYP themselves. Conclusion: CYP who registered earlier were less symptomatic, although those registering later did show increased improvement in their symptoms, indicating that the Hub was beneficial. Parental well-being was associated with child mental distress, indicating that shared family trauma should be considered when planning care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of British Journal of Psychiatry is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Background: The Resilience Hub was established to coordinate mental health and psychosocial support for anyone affected by the 2017 Manchester Arena terrorist attack. Aims: To use the Hub's mental health screening data to examine the variation in symptoms reported by children and young persons (CYP) and their parent/guardian and explore any association with time delay in post-event registration or parental distress. Method: CYP engaging with Hub services were separated into eight 'admission' groups depending on when they registered post-incident. CYP were screened for trauma, depression, and generalised and separation anxiety. Parents/guardians also completed screening measures for their own and their child's anxiety. Baseline and follow-up scores were compared between admission groups. Parental and CYP assessments of the CYP's anxiety score was compared with the measure of parental distress. Results: Almost half of CYP registered in the first 3 months of service launch, with numbers of new registrations falling during each subsequent screening cycle. Generally, there was an increase in baseline screening scores as Hub registration time increased. The Children's Impact of Event scale score decreased by 0.11 (95% CI: −0.17, −0.05) per month, but the score for depression increased by 0.06 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.10). Longitudinal patterns in anxiety and separation were difficult to discern. Screening scores of CYP registering later reduced at a faster rate than those of the first registrants. Higher levels of parental mental distress were correlated with increased anxiety scores assigned to the CYP in relation to the anxiety score reported by the CYP themselves. Conclusion: CYP who registered earlier were less symptomatic, although those registering later did show increased improvement in their symptoms, indicating that the Hub was beneficial. Parental well-being was associated with child mental distress, indicating that shared family trauma should be considered when planning care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00071250
DOI:10.1192/bjp.2025.10310