Alexa, shut up! – A 2.5-year study on negatively connotated communication behaviour towards voice assistants in the family home.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Alexa, shut up! – A 2.5-year study on negatively connotated communication behaviour towards voice assistants in the family home.
Authors: Strathmann, Clara (AUTHOR), Horstmann, Aike C. (AUTHOR), Szczuka, Jessica M. (AUTHOR), Krämer, Nicole C. (AUTHOR)
Source: Behaviour & Information Technology. Mar2026, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p821-839. 19p.
Subjects: Repeated measures design, Satisfaction, Research funding, T-test (Statistics), Invective, Parenting, Parent attitudes, Social perception, Home environment, Descriptive statistics, Teenagers' conduct of life, Assistive technology, Longitudinal method, Communication, Social skills, Data analysis software, Child behavior, User interfaces
Geographic Terms: Germany
Abstract: Users often mindlessly treat machines such as voice assistants (VAs) like social beings, speaking politely despite VAs functioning as commandable tools that do not require polite expressions. In fact, unnecessary words can even impair interactions, causing frustration. This contrast between social and functional interactions is especially relevant in family homes with children, where VAs are often integrated long-term. Since children are still learning social communication rules, they might adopt negatively connotated communication patterns with the VA, such as a lack of politeness, commanding phrasing, or verbal abuse. Over 2.5 years, 128 parents therefore completed six online surveys about their own and their children's communication behaviour towards and relationship with their VA, as well as their own social perception of and satisfaction with the VA. Multilevel analyses revealed that parents considered themselves to be more polite to the VA than their children. Perceived relationship closeness between children and VA positively predicted children's commanding, politeness, and verbal abuse tendencies towards the VA over time, whereas for the parents, relationship closeness only influenced politeness. The findings highlight the potential impact of social perceptions on long-term communication with VAs and tackle the concern of VA's negative impact on human-human communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Behaviour & Information Technology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:Users often mindlessly treat machines such as voice assistants (VAs) like social beings, speaking politely despite VAs functioning as commandable tools that do not require polite expressions. In fact, unnecessary words can even impair interactions, causing frustration. This contrast between social and functional interactions is especially relevant in family homes with children, where VAs are often integrated long-term. Since children are still learning social communication rules, they might adopt negatively connotated communication patterns with the VA, such as a lack of politeness, commanding phrasing, or verbal abuse. Over 2.5 years, 128 parents therefore completed six online surveys about their own and their children's communication behaviour towards and relationship with their VA, as well as their own social perception of and satisfaction with the VA. Multilevel analyses revealed that parents considered themselves to be more polite to the VA than their children. Perceived relationship closeness between children and VA positively predicted children's commanding, politeness, and verbal abuse tendencies towards the VA over time, whereas for the parents, relationship closeness only influenced politeness. The findings highlight the potential impact of social perceptions on long-term communication with VAs and tackle the concern of VA's negative impact on human-human communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:0144929X
DOI:10.1080/0144929X.2025.2533352