Bridging the gap: The role of the relational approach in neuropsychological rehabilitation.
Saved in:
| Title: | Bridging the gap: The role of the relational approach in neuropsychological rehabilitation. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Athanasiadou-Lewis, Catherine (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Counselling Psychology Review. Feb2026, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p16-25. 10p. |
| Subjects: | Neuropsychological rehabilitation, Interpersonal relations, Brain injuries, Counseling, Clinical neuropsychology, Psychodynamics, Social contact |
| Abstract: | Context: The aim of the current paper is to provide an overview of the literature surrounding relational interventions and their relevance to neuropsychological rehabilitation following brain injury. Relational interventions are commonly applied within couples therapy where one partner has survived a traumatic brain injury, but the framework holds relevance to wider neuropsychological practice, moving away from the traditional 'one-person psychology' to a more diverse matrix composed of relational, social, cultural and universal forces upon the mind. From a reflexive standpoint, relationality is at the core of the reflective practitioner model that underpins the professional framework of counselling psychology (CoP) and is therefore an essential aspect of the science-practitioner model of a CoP in clinical neuropsychology. With clinical neuropsychology becoming a pathway for post-doctoral training for counselling psychologists for the first time in the UK, and with many counselling psychologists already practicing in this field, this paper explores the importance of relational practice within neurorehabilitation in the backdrop of epistemological barriers. Conclusion: Advances in psychodynamic neuroscience, neuropsychology and neuropsychoanalysis, have opened a new interdisciplinary dialogue that foregrounds the vital role of relational processes in neurorehabilitation. By mapping interpersonal dynamics onto brain function, this growing body of knowledge underscores how relational practice can enhance neural integration, promote psychological resilience, and support long-term functional outcomes. Relationally driven approaches are not merely supplemental to neurorehabilitation but are central to it, providing a powerful, evidence-informed pathway for recovery across all stages of the life span. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Counselling Psychology Review is the property of British Psychological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Context: The aim of the current paper is to provide an overview of the literature surrounding relational interventions and their relevance to neuropsychological rehabilitation following brain injury. Relational interventions are commonly applied within couples therapy where one partner has survived a traumatic brain injury, but the framework holds relevance to wider neuropsychological practice, moving away from the traditional 'one-person psychology' to a more diverse matrix composed of relational, social, cultural and universal forces upon the mind. From a reflexive standpoint, relationality is at the core of the reflective practitioner model that underpins the professional framework of counselling psychology (CoP) and is therefore an essential aspect of the science-practitioner model of a CoP in clinical neuropsychology. With clinical neuropsychology becoming a pathway for post-doctoral training for counselling psychologists for the first time in the UK, and with many counselling psychologists already practicing in this field, this paper explores the importance of relational practice within neurorehabilitation in the backdrop of epistemological barriers. Conclusion: Advances in psychodynamic neuroscience, neuropsychology and neuropsychoanalysis, have opened a new interdisciplinary dialogue that foregrounds the vital role of relational processes in neurorehabilitation. By mapping interpersonal dynamics onto brain function, this growing body of knowledge underscores how relational practice can enhance neural integration, promote psychological resilience, and support long-term functional outcomes. Relationally driven approaches are not merely supplemental to neurorehabilitation but are central to it, providing a powerful, evidence-informed pathway for recovery across all stages of the life span. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 17572142 |
| DOI: | 10.53841/bpscpr.2026.40.1.16 |
