The right schedule for marijuana (among other drugs) does not yet exist.
Saved in:
| Title: | The right schedule for marijuana (among other drugs) does not yet exist. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Pozen, David (AUTHOR), Lawrence, Matthew (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Science. 3/19/2026, Vol. 391 Issue 6791, p1210-1212. 3p. |
| Subjects: | Controlled substances, United States. Drug Enforcement Administration, Drug legalization, Drug laws, Marijuana legalization, Drug control, Marijuana laws |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | In the process currently underway to reconsider the status of marijuana under US law, many have urged the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to engage in rigorous, evidence-based policy-making. But the agency's choices about how to regulate marijuana are sharply—and irrationally—constrained by the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and its menu of drug "schedules." These schedules often force regulators into a Hobson's choice between overcriminalizing drugs, through prohibitions that predictably backfire, or overcommercializing drugs, through hands-off approaches that leave users vulnerable to corporate exploitation. Analogous limits constrain scheduling choices under the United Nations (UN) drug conventions. The policy that must change to bring rationality to the regulation of marijuana, along with many other controlled substances, is not the schedule in which marijuana is placed but rather the scheduling system itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Science is the property of American Association for the Advancement of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | In the process currently underway to reconsider the status of marijuana under US law, many have urged the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to engage in rigorous, evidence-based policy-making. But the agency's choices about how to regulate marijuana are sharply—and irrationally—constrained by the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and its menu of drug "schedules." These schedules often force regulators into a Hobson's choice between overcriminalizing drugs, through prohibitions that predictably backfire, or overcommercializing drugs, through hands-off approaches that leave users vulnerable to corporate exploitation. Analogous limits constrain scheduling choices under the United Nations (UN) drug conventions. The policy that must change to bring rationality to the regulation of marijuana, along with many other controlled substances, is not the schedule in which marijuana is placed but rather the scheduling system itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00368075 |
| DOI: | 10.1126/science.aec5633 |
