Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Mastering the Discursive Paper: Balancing the Argument. |
| Authors: |
Cleary, Michelle (NURSE), Kornhaber, Rachel (NURSE), Lagadec, Danielle Le (NURSE), Hungerford, Catherine (NURSE) |
| Source: |
Issues in Mental Health Nursing. Apr2026, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p419-421. 3p. |
| Subjects: |
Nurses, Electronic journals, Authorship, Discussion, Publishing, Ability, Medical research personnel, Training, Critical thinking |
| Abstract: |
The article focuses on the nature, purpose, and structure of discursive papers, particularly within health-related and mental health nursing journals. It explains that discursive papers aim to present balanced, critical arguments on a topic, enabling readers to form their own conclusions through the use of high-quality, peer-reviewed evidence and theoretical frameworks. Unlike data-driven research or literature reviews, discursive papers emphasize depth of critical thinking, logical argumentation, and scholarly contribution, often allowing flexibility in structure and tone while adhering to academic and ethical standards. The article also offers guidance for authors and reviewers on key components, including clarity of purpose, balanced evidence, and the articulation of implications for practice or research. [Extracted from the article] |
|
Copyright of Issues in Mental Health Nursing is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
