The Effectiveness of Peer Support Interventions for Improving Cocaine and Crack Cocaine Treatment Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Effectiveness of Peer Support Interventions for Improving Cocaine and Crack Cocaine Treatment Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Authors: Duopah, Yaa Asuaba (AUTHOR), Kittle, Esme (AUTHOR), Moran, Lisa (AUTHOR), Elmusharaf, Khalifa (AUTHOR), Kelly, Dervla (AUTHOR)
Source: Substance Use & Misuse. 2026, Vol. 61 Issue 8, p1192-1203. 12p.
Subjects: Cocaine, Substance abuse, Patient compliance, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Support groups, Affinity groups, Positive psychology, CINAHL database, Treatment effectiveness, Descriptive statistics, Systematic reviews, Social support, Interpersonal relations, Data analysis software, Crack cocaine, Drug abusers, Social participation, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, Evaluation
Abstract: Background: Cocaine use disorder (CUD) has been linked to unique challenges and behaviors that may have an impact on how peer support functions regarding persons with CUD. For individuals with active substance use, peer support has been linked to positive impacts in areas such as treatment retention and recovery outcomes. As a result, this paper examines the effectiveness of peer support for the treatment of CUD. Methodology: Literature searches were conducted in four databases for studies examining peer support interventions for cocaine and/or crack cocaine users. Article selection was undertaken in two stages: abstract screening and full-text screening. A narrative synthesis approach was used for data analysis. Results: Four studies reported statistically significant results in cocaine use outcomes, underlining the potential effectiveness of peer support interventions in positively facilitating changes in cocaine use outcomes. Three studies demonstrated that peer support interventions positively influence participation in substance use treatment and related activities. Overall, treatment enrollment rates were high among the studies reviewed. The inconsistent reporting on peer training across studies was discovered. Lastly, the general lack of qualitative studies poses a limitation in completely understanding the intricacies of peer support on CUD treatment. Conclusion: Peer support interventions show promise in improving cocaine use outcomes, but difficulties such as methodological issues and limited research remain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Substance Use & Misuse is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Background: Cocaine use disorder (CUD) has been linked to unique challenges and behaviors that may have an impact on how peer support functions regarding persons with CUD. For individuals with active substance use, peer support has been linked to positive impacts in areas such as treatment retention and recovery outcomes. As a result, this paper examines the effectiveness of peer support for the treatment of CUD. Methodology: Literature searches were conducted in four databases for studies examining peer support interventions for cocaine and/or crack cocaine users. Article selection was undertaken in two stages: abstract screening and full-text screening. A narrative synthesis approach was used for data analysis. Results: Four studies reported statistically significant results in cocaine use outcomes, underlining the potential effectiveness of peer support interventions in positively facilitating changes in cocaine use outcomes. Three studies demonstrated that peer support interventions positively influence participation in substance use treatment and related activities. Overall, treatment enrollment rates were high among the studies reviewed. The inconsistent reporting on peer training across studies was discovered. Lastly, the general lack of qualitative studies poses a limitation in completely understanding the intricacies of peer support on CUD treatment. Conclusion: Peer support interventions show promise in improving cocaine use outcomes, but difficulties such as methodological issues and limited research remain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10826084
DOI:10.1080/10826084.2025.2600642