Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Similar moral values, different agendas: U.S. politicians' use of moral language is issue‐specific. |
| Authors: |
Côté, Éloïse (AUTHOR), Wang, Sze‐Yuh Nina (AUTHOR), Inbar, Yoel (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Political Psychology. Jun2026, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p1-21. 21p. |
| Subjects: |
Politicians, Political communication, Republicans, Rhetoric, Communication ethics, United States. Congress, Democrats (United States), Twitter (Web resource) |
| Geographic Terms: |
United States |
| Abstract: |
We used Structured Topic Models (STM) combined with a word embedding model to examine U.S. politicians' use of moral language and identify the issues Democrats and Republicans moralize most on X (formerly Twitter). Analyzing 1,578,057 posts from U.S. members of Congress (2019–2023), we found that (1) Democrats and Republicans did not differ meaningfully in what kinds of moral language they used but that (2) they used moral language for different issues. For example, Republicans used language reflecting harm and care to criticize Democratic economic policies, whereas Democrats used it to criticize Trump's immigration policies. These findings suggest that politicians on the right and left rhetorically invoke similar moral values but do so to highlight different issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Political Psychology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
