"I don't think people realise how important they are": a mixed methods evaluation of Samaritans' services.
Saved in:
| Title: | "I don't think people realise how important they are": a mixed methods evaluation of Samaritans' services. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Goodwin, John (AUTHOR), Dowling, Michael (AUTHOR), Hayes, Kristy (AUTHOR), Kilty, Caroline (AUTHOR), O'Malley, Maria (AUTHOR), Pierce, Sinead (AUTHOR), Behan, Laura (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Mental Health. Jun2026, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p319-329. 11p. |
| Subjects: | Suicide prevention, Cross-sectional method, Volunteer service, Self-injurious behavior, Mental health services, Helplines, Mental health, Research funding, Privacy, Interviewing, Crisis intervention (Mental health services), Help-seeking behavior, Descriptive statistics, Thematic analysis, Research methodology, Psychological stress, Communication, Patient satisfaction, Interpersonal relations, Counseling, Social support, Data analysis software, Patients' attitudes, Medical ethics |
| Geographic Terms: | Ireland |
| Abstract: | Background: Since the first suicide helpline was established in 1953, telephone support helplines have expanded globally. One such helpline is Samaritans. Previous studies on Samaritans have explored volunteers' perspectives and examined the number of calls users make. Aims: The aim of this study was to capture the users' experiences of Samaritans' helpline in Ireland. Methods: A mixed methods methodology, incorporating quantitative (cross-sectional) and qualitative (qualitative descriptive) elements was adopted. Participants accessed surveys via Samaritans' website. At the end of the survey, participants could self-select to partake in 1:1 online interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics; qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: A total of 395 respondents completed the survey. Telephone was the most prominent format of contact with Samaritans, at 88.6% (n = 350). Mental health was cited as the main reason callers connected with Samaritans. Almost half of respondents felt supported a lot (47.3%, n = 187). Qualitative analysis identified three themes: Availability, Accessibility, Anonymity; Connecting with Volunteers; and Expectations of Samaritans' Services. Conclusions: Samaritans' services are highly valued by those who engage with them. However, there is a need to enhance public awareness about the specific supports Samaritans provide, and the formats of contact that are available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Mental Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Background: Since the first suicide helpline was established in 1953, telephone support helplines have expanded globally. One such helpline is Samaritans. Previous studies on Samaritans have explored volunteers' perspectives and examined the number of calls users make. Aims: The aim of this study was to capture the users' experiences of Samaritans' helpline in Ireland. Methods: A mixed methods methodology, incorporating quantitative (cross-sectional) and qualitative (qualitative descriptive) elements was adopted. Participants accessed surveys via Samaritans' website. At the end of the survey, participants could self-select to partake in 1:1 online interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics; qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: A total of 395 respondents completed the survey. Telephone was the most prominent format of contact with Samaritans, at 88.6% (n = 350). Mental health was cited as the main reason callers connected with Samaritans. Almost half of respondents felt supported a lot (47.3%, n = 187). Qualitative analysis identified three themes: Availability, Accessibility, Anonymity; Connecting with Volunteers; and Expectations of Samaritans' Services. Conclusions: Samaritans' services are highly valued by those who engage with them. However, there is a need to enhance public awareness about the specific supports Samaritans provide, and the formats of contact that are available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 09638237 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09638237.2025.2607986 |
