Differentiation of suicide outcomes using network analysis: The role of non-suicidal self-injury characteristics, negative affective states, and stressful life experiences.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Differentiation of suicide outcomes using network analysis: The role of non-suicidal self-injury characteristics, negative affective states, and stressful life experiences.
Authors: Webster, Aiyana E. (AUTHOR), Orlowski, Edmund W. (AUTHOR), Bozzay, Melanie L. (AUTHOR), Gryglewicz, Kim (AUTHOR), Karver, Marc (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of American College Health. May2026, Vol. 74 Issue 5, p1426-1439. 14p.
Subjects: Suicide risk factors, Self-injurious behavior, Life change events, Risk assessment, Statistical correlation, Wounds & injuries, Cross-sectional method, Suicidal ideation, Social network analysis, Risk-taking behavior, Burns & scalds, Research funding, Anger, Sex distribution, Chi-squared test, Descriptive statistics, Experience, Surveys, Psychological stress, Research, Despair, Affect (Psychology), Psychology of college students, Data analysis software, Mental depression, Epidemiological research
Geographic Terms: Florida
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the role of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) characteristics, negative affective states, and stressful life experiences (SLEs) in differentiating risk for suicidal ideation (SI) vs suicide attempt (SA) in college students. Participants: College students (n = 1,940; 1,493 women, 447 men) from a Florida university. Methods: Participants recruited via email completed an online survey. Network analysis was used to estimate and compare four risk networks. Results: Cutting, trauma, worthlessness, and depression were directly associated with both SI and SA, with cutting demonstrating the strongest associations. Cutting and discrimination were uniquely associated with SA, while burning and anger were uniquely associated with SI. Several gender differences were identified in associations between suicide risk factors. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the role of gender in differentiating NSSI features associated with suicide risk. Moreover, they emphasize the need to evaluate NSSI method and SLEs, particularly cutting and discrimination, in suicide risk assessment for college students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of American College Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the role of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) characteristics, negative affective states, and stressful life experiences (SLEs) in differentiating risk for suicidal ideation (SI) vs suicide attempt (SA) in college students. Participants: College students (n = 1,940; 1,493 women, 447 men) from a Florida university. Methods: Participants recruited via email completed an online survey. Network analysis was used to estimate and compare four risk networks. Results: Cutting, trauma, worthlessness, and depression were directly associated with both SI and SA, with cutting demonstrating the strongest associations. Cutting and discrimination were uniquely associated with SA, while burning and anger were uniquely associated with SI. Several gender differences were identified in associations between suicide risk factors. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the role of gender in differentiating NSSI features associated with suicide risk. Moreover, they emphasize the need to evaluate NSSI method and SLEs, particularly cutting and discrimination, in suicide risk assessment for college students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:07448481
DOI:10.1080/07448481.2025.2577662