View in EDS

Do People Think Abstractly Inside Cathedrals? The Role of Place Size and Religiosity on Construal Level.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Do People Think Abstractly Inside Cathedrals? The Role of Place Size and Religiosity on Construal Level.
Authors: Callizo, Carmen (AUTHOR), Solana, Pablo (AUTHOR), Taves, Ann (AUTHOR), Wildman, Wesley (AUTHOR), Santiago, Julio (AUTHOR)
Source: International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. Apr-Jun2026, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p380-405. 26p.
Subjects: Religiousness, Cathedrals, Abstract thought, Experimental psychology, Psychological distance, Magnitude (Mathematics)
Abstract: This registered report (N = 2,466; >90% power to detect d ≥ 0.13) tested whether imagining oneself in large and religious places, such as cathedrals, promotes abstract thinking. Participants imagined themselves in one of the four experimental scenarios varying in size (large vs. small) and type (religious vs. secular), wrote about their imagined experience there, and completed validated measures assessing abstraction (neutral vs. religious content) and personal religiosity. Consistent with preregistered hypotheses, abstraction was higher in religious than secular places, for religious than neutral content, and among more religious participants; the latter two factors also interacted. In contrast, place size showed no effect. Equivalence tests indicated that only effects involving personal religiosity approached practical significance (d =.40). Overall, religiosity-related factors predicted abstraction whereas spatial magnitude did not. Because spatial magnitude was a proxy for the spatial dimension of psychological distance, the findings did not support Construal Level Theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal for the Psychology of Religion is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:This registered report (N = 2,466; >90% power to detect d ≥ 0.13) tested whether imagining oneself in large and religious places, such as cathedrals, promotes abstract thinking. Participants imagined themselves in one of the four experimental scenarios varying in size (large vs. small) and type (religious vs. secular), wrote about their imagined experience there, and completed validated measures assessing abstraction (neutral vs. religious content) and personal religiosity. Consistent with preregistered hypotheses, abstraction was higher in religious than secular places, for religious than neutral content, and among more religious participants; the latter two factors also interacted. In contrast, place size showed no effect. Equivalence tests indicated that only effects involving personal religiosity approached practical significance (d =.40). Overall, religiosity-related factors predicted abstraction whereas spatial magnitude did not. Because spatial magnitude was a proxy for the spatial dimension of psychological distance, the findings did not support Construal Level Theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10508619
DOI:10.1080/10508619.2026.2675179