Perceived Mental Health and Socioeconomic Impacts of Testing Positive for COVID‐19: Qualitative Findings From a Regional Sample in New Mexico.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Perceived Mental Health and Socioeconomic Impacts of Testing Positive for COVID‐19: Qualitative Findings From a Regional Sample in New Mexico.
Authors: Gantt‐Howrey, Alexandra, Rocha, Johana, Lin, Mickey
Source: Journal of Counseling & Development (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). Jul2026, Vol. 104 Issue 3, p460-473. 14p.
Subjects: Medically underserved areas, Fear, Attitudes toward death, Health services accessibility, Social determinants of health, Mental health, Health attitudes, Attitudes toward illness, Research funding, Qualitative research, Institutional racism, Interviewing, Vaccination, COVID-19 vaccines, Emotions, Anxiety, Uncertainty, Psychological adaptation, Thematic analysis, Attitude (Psychology), Frustration, Rural conditions, Conceptual structures, Research methodology, Counseling, COVID-19, Patients' attitudes, Social isolation, Self-perception, COVID-19 pandemic
Geographic Terms: New Mexico
Abstract: While the consequences of the COVID‐19 pandemic were widely documented, little is known about specific mental health and social determinants of mental health (SDMH) outcomes according to individuals who tested positive for COVID‐19, particularly in rural and underserved regions of the United States. Through a generic qualitative approach, we conducted a thematic analysis to understand how testing positive for COVID‐19 shaped the mental health and socioeconomic realities of eight adult residents of New Mexico, guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (2025) Research Framework. Participants reported adverse emotional experiences, income disruptions, relational rupture, and barriers to quality healthcare. Findings suggest these outcomes are interrelated, provide greater context on the ramifications of a COVID‐19 diagnosis on SDMH, and underscore the need for universal SDMH assessment, culturally responsive treatment planning, and multilevel advocacy in counseling practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Counseling & Development (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:While the consequences of the COVID‐19 pandemic were widely documented, little is known about specific mental health and social determinants of mental health (SDMH) outcomes according to individuals who tested positive for COVID‐19, particularly in rural and underserved regions of the United States. Through a generic qualitative approach, we conducted a thematic analysis to understand how testing positive for COVID‐19 shaped the mental health and socioeconomic realities of eight adult residents of New Mexico, guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (2025) Research Framework. Participants reported adverse emotional experiences, income disruptions, relational rupture, and barriers to quality healthcare. Findings suggest these outcomes are interrelated, provide greater context on the ramifications of a COVID‐19 diagnosis on SDMH, and underscore the need for universal SDMH assessment, culturally responsive treatment planning, and multilevel advocacy in counseling practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:15566676
DOI:10.1002/jcad.70045