Measurement Invariance of the Reynolds Depression Adolescent Scale across Gender and Age.
Saved in:
| Title: | Measurement Invariance of the Reynolds Depression Adolescent Scale across Gender and Age. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Fonseca-Pedrero, Eduardo (AUTHOR), Wells, Craig (AUTHOR), Paino, Mercedes (AUTHOR), Lemos-Giráldez, Serafín (AUTHOR), Villazón-García, Úrsula (AUTHOR), Sierra, Susana (AUTHOR), González, MaPaz García-Portilla (AUTHOR), Bobes, Julio (AUTHOR), Muñiz, José (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | International Journal of Testing. Apr-Jun2010, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p133-148. 16p. 3 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale, Confirmatory factor analysis, Anhedonia, Gender, Age, Diagnosis of depression in adolescents |
| Abstract: | The main objective of the present study was to examine measurement invariance of the Reynolds Depression Adolescent Scale (RADS) (Reynolds, 1987) across gender and age in a representative sample of nonclinical adolescents. The sample was composed of 1,659 participants, 801 males (48.3%), with a mean age of 15.9 years (SD = 1.2). Confirmatory factor analysis supported Reynolds' (2002) four-factor model, consisting of the Anhedonia, Somatic Complaints, Negative Self-Evaluation, and Dysphoric Mood dimensions. In addition, the results support the measurement invariance of the RADS across gender and age. When latent means were compared as a function of gender and age, statistically significant differences were found. Females obtained higher scores than males in Somatic Complaints, Negative Self-Evaluation, and Dysphoric Mood. On the other hand, males obtained higher scores in Anhedonia. As a function of age, the 17-19 year olds obtained higher scores than the 14-16 year olds in Dysphoric Mood. The results suggest that the RADS could be used as an efficient self-report to test measurement invariance of depressive symptomatology across gender and age. Future studies should continue to explore measurement invariance across cultures and the incorporation of the latest advances in assessment methods in the clinical field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Journal of Testing is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The main objective of the present study was to examine measurement invariance of the Reynolds Depression Adolescent Scale (RADS) (Reynolds, 1987) across gender and age in a representative sample of nonclinical adolescents. The sample was composed of 1,659 participants, 801 males (48.3%), with a mean age of 15.9 years (SD = 1.2). Confirmatory factor analysis supported Reynolds' (2002) four-factor model, consisting of the Anhedonia, Somatic Complaints, Negative Self-Evaluation, and Dysphoric Mood dimensions. In addition, the results support the measurement invariance of the RADS across gender and age. When latent means were compared as a function of gender and age, statistically significant differences were found. Females obtained higher scores than males in Somatic Complaints, Negative Self-Evaluation, and Dysphoric Mood. On the other hand, males obtained higher scores in Anhedonia. As a function of age, the 17-19 year olds obtained higher scores than the 14-16 year olds in Dysphoric Mood. The results suggest that the RADS could be used as an efficient self-report to test measurement invariance of depressive symptomatology across gender and age. Future studies should continue to explore measurement invariance across cultures and the incorporation of the latest advances in assessment methods in the clinical field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15305058 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15305050903580822 |
