Misconceptions about childhood sexual abuse and child witnesses: Implications for psychological experts in the courtroom.
Saved in:
| Title: | Misconceptions about childhood sexual abuse and child witnesses: Implications for psychological experts in the courtroom. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Zajac, Rachel (AUTHOR), Garry, Maryanne (AUTHOR), London, Kamala (AUTHOR), Goodyear-Smith, Felicity (AUTHOR), Hayne, Harlene (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Memory. Jul2013, Vol. 21 Issue 5, p608-617. 10p. |
| Subjects: | Child abuse, Sex crimes, Child witnesses, Expert evidence, Courts, Legal testimony, Empirical research |
| Abstract: | Recent changes to the law in New Zealand have led to a marked increase in experts being called to give evidence in cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Here we outline some of the common misconceptions that are held by expert witnesses in these cases and we review research on patterns of abuse disclosure and retraction, symptoms of abuse, external influences on children's reports, and experts' ability to distinguish true from false reports. We also consider what expertscansay about memory that has relevance for these cases. We conclude that many long-held notions of child sexual abuse and children's testimony that make their way into our courtrooms are not supported by empirical research, raising questions about who is—and who is not—qualified to act as an expert witness. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
| Copyright of Memory is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Recent changes to the law in New Zealand have led to a marked increase in experts being called to give evidence in cases of alleged child sexual abuse. Here we outline some of the common misconceptions that are held by expert witnesses in these cases and we review research on patterns of abuse disclosure and retraction, symptoms of abuse, external influences on children's reports, and experts' ability to distinguish true from false reports. We also consider what expertscansay about memory that has relevance for these cases. We conclude that many long-held notions of child sexual abuse and children's testimony that make their way into our courtrooms are not supported by empirical research, raising questions about who is—and who is not—qualified to act as an expert witness. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 09658211 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09658211.2013.778287 |
