ACADEMIC AFFILIATIONS OF SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL ARTICLE AUTHORS, 2004-2008.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: ACADEMIC AFFILIATIONS OF SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL ARTICLE AUTHORS, 2004-2008.
Authors: Ligon, Jan (AUTHOR), Cobb, Alicia (AUTHOR), Thyer, Bruce (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Social Work Education. Fall2012, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p613-622. 10p.
Subjects: Authorship, Publishing, Serial publications, Social case work, Universities & colleges, Citation analysis
Abstract: The researchers tabulated the academic affiliations of the authors of all articles published between 2004 and 2008 in 6 major social work journals to produce a ranking of the colleges and universities whose faculty made the most substantive contributions to the social work literature. The results of this analysis are compared with findings of 5 identical, previously published studies, which cover the 5-year periods of 1979-1983, 1984-1988, 1989-1993, 1994-1998, and 1999-2003. The limitations of this method of analysis are discussed, as are its merits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Social Work Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection
Description
Abstract:The researchers tabulated the academic affiliations of the authors of all articles published between 2004 and 2008 in 6 major social work journals to produce a ranking of the colleges and universities whose faculty made the most substantive contributions to the social work literature. The results of this analysis are compared with findings of 5 identical, previously published studies, which cover the 5-year periods of 1979-1983, 1984-1988, 1989-1993, 1994-1998, and 1999-2003. The limitations of this method of analysis are discussed, as are its merits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10437797
DOI:10.5175/JSWE.2012.201000150