Micropolíticas juveniles en Bogotá: cuerpo, espacio y palabra en la producción de lo común.
Saved in:
| Title: | Micropolíticas juveniles en Bogotá: cuerpo, espacio y palabra en la producción de lo común. (Spanish). |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Youth micropolitics in Bogotá: body, space, and word in the production of the common. (English) Micropolíticas juvenis em Bogotá: corpo, espaço e palavra na produção do comum. (Portuguese) |
| Authors: | RODRÍGUEZ MEJÍA, Jhonny Alejandro |
| Source: | Chasqui (13901079). dic 2025 - mar 2026, Issue 160, p199-215. 17p. |
| Subjects: | POLITICS & culture, PUBLIC art spaces, HUMAN geography, BOUNDARY disputes, NARRATIVES, PUBLIC spaces, CERTEAU, Michel de, 1925-1986 |
| Geographic Terms: | BOGOTA (Colombia) |
| Abstract (English): | This article examines how youth aesthetic-political practices in Bogotá's peripheries --murals, performances, hashtags, and manifestos-- operate as tactical assemblages that produce the common from conditions of precarity. Using a hermeneutic-interpretive approach, we analyze public materials (2021-2025) to trace the intersection of body, space, and word. The framework draws on De Certeau (2000), Quintana (2020), Reguillo (2003, 2010, 2017), Rancière (2014), and Das (2007). Findings indicate: (i) bodily tactics that reorder the urban sensorium; (ii) territorial disputes that rewrite memory and belonging; and (iii) minor narratives that fissure institutional grammar. We conclude these practices are not merely symbolic: they institute affective geographies and infrastructures of care, envisioning horizons of the common despite attempts at co-optation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Este artículo examina cómo prácticas estético-políticas juveniles en periferias de Bogotá --murales, performances, hashtags y manifiestos-- operan como ensamblajes tácticos que producen lo común desde la precariedad. Con un enfoque hermenéutico-interpretativo, se analizan materiales públicos (2021-2025) para rastrear la intersección entre cuerpo, espacio y palabra. El marco articula a De Certeau (2000), Quintana (2020), Reguillo (2003, 2010, 2017), Rancière (2014) y Das (2007). Los hallazgos muestran: i) tácticas corporales que reordenan la sensibilidad urbana; ii) disputas territoriales que reescriben memoria y pertenencia; iii) narrativas menores que fisuran la gramática institucional. Concluimos que estas prácticas no son meramente simbólicas: instituyen geografías afectivas e infraestructuras de cuidado, imaginando horizontes de lo común pese a intentos de cooptación. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Portuguese): | Este artigo examina como práticas estético-políticas juvenis nas periferias de Bogotá --murais, performances, hashtags e manifestos-- operam como assemblagens táticas que produzem o comum a partir da precariedade. Com uma abordagem hermenêutico-interpretativa, analisamos materiais públicos (2021-2025) para rastrear a interseção entre corpo, espaço e palavra. O referencial articula De Certeau (2000), Quintana (2020), Reguillo (2003, 2010, 2017), Rancière (2014) e Das (2007). Os achados indicam: (i) táticas corporais que reordenam a sensibilidade urbana; (ii) disputas territoriais que reescrevem memória e pertencimento; e (iii) narrativas menores que fissuram a gramática institucional. Concluímos que essas práticas não são meramente simbólicas: instituem geografias afetivas e infraestruturas de cuidado, imaginando horizontes do comum apesar de tentativas de cooptação. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Database: | Referencia Latina |
| Abstract: | This article examines how youth aesthetic-political practices in Bogotá's peripheries --murals, performances, hashtags, and manifestos-- operate as tactical assemblages that produce the common from conditions of precarity. Using a hermeneutic-interpretive approach, we analyze public materials (2021-2025) to trace the intersection of body, space, and word. The framework draws on De Certeau (2000), Quintana (2020), Reguillo (2003, 2010, 2017), Rancière (2014), and Das (2007). Findings indicate: (i) bodily tactics that reorder the urban sensorium; (ii) territorial disputes that rewrite memory and belonging; and (iii) minor narratives that fissure institutional grammar. We conclude these practices are not merely symbolic: they institute affective geographies and infrastructures of care, envisioning horizons of the common despite attempts at co-optation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 13901079 |
